更正

如果我们出了错，会在报道中及本页注明日期予以说明。我们不会悄悄修改报道后一走了之：原文会保留在原来的网址上，更正说明则附在其上方。

• 更正 · 2026-09-18

  XRP攀升6.9% 比特币反弹破$80,000重燃黄金交叉话题

  We reported that Bitcoin had rebounded above $800,000. The figure is wrong by a factor of ten: Bitcoin was trading at about $80,900 at the time, and our own price tape recorded $80,933 forty-five seconds before this story was first published. The error came from the summary of the source article we drew on, which read "Bitcoin claws its way above $800,000", and we repeated it in our headline, card, body and share card without checking it against the price data we already held. The figure has been corrected to $80,000 throughout and in all eight editions. A version of this story carrying the wrong figure was also sent to our Telegram channel at 17:33 UTC and cannot be unsent.

• 更正 · 2026-08-20

  906 BTC 在 Bitcoin 上通过单笔转账完成转移

  从2026年8月20日发布至2026年8月21日，该故事没有自己的地址。2026年8月15日发布的另一笔比特币转账产生了相同的标题，因此也产生了相同的URL，该URL提供了8月15日的事件。读者如果按照该故事的规范ID BYTE-2026-08-20-0774，会在显示BYTE-2026-08-15-1017的页面上看到8月15日的交易——这是与他们请求的ID不同的规范ID。互联网档案馆在8月20日08:52 UTC拍摄的快照中保留了这个错误的配对，因此它是公开记录，仅通过此更改无法纠正。该故事现在拥有自己的地址。8月15日的故事保留了原始地址，因为它首先发布，其URL是有效的。现在在创建时使生成的段落唯一，规范ID解析器不再通过它们解析。

• 更正 · 2026-08-19

  the on-chain ledger

  The ERC-20 watcher recorded each transfer LEG of a transaction as a separate movement. Where a transaction's legs net out — a token routed through an intermediary and back, which is most of what a bridge or a market maker does — the ledger reported money moving that never moved. 71 rows published on 2026-08-18 and 2026-08-19, claiming a combined $9,236,295,454, were wrong and have been withdrawn from this page and from /api/v1/whales.json. The watcher now collapses a transaction's transfers per address before the recording threshold is applied, so a net-zero transaction records nothing. The superseded rows are kept verbatim in data/onchain_corrections/ — the record of what we published is not edited, only marked.